Oak tree concerns not founded in B & G Subdivision

Posted

Concerns about the destruction of Oregon White Oak trees growing in a planned subdivision in Battle Ground are unfounded, city officials say.

Over the course of late July and early August, The Reflector received claims the current “B & G” Subdivision was developing past what it was set to do.

Those who pushed against the development said it was encroaching on established rights of way, and most prominently, destroying identified Oregon White Oak trees. 

Battle Ground city spokesperson Alisha Smith said as of Aug. 4 those trees had been identified with an orange wrap along them.

“There are some trees that will be removed, it sounds, but any Oregon White Oaks, and any trees that are in the identified wetlands, will not be removed. They don’t have authorization to remove,” Smith said.

Smith said there were inspectors to enforce plans when looking at subdivisions.



Smith said their removal would involve the Department of Ecology. The department itself said that would be handled at a local level.

“Ecology wouldn’t have anything to say about the oaks. That would be a city issue — likely falling under city or county code or Critical Area Ordinance,” department spokesperson Jeff Zenk said in an email.

Smith said in an email the city has not received an official developer agreement regarding the development. 

As of Aug. 5, Smith said the city’s code compliance officer only received one complaint regarding construction dust. That complaint was ultimately ruled unfounded given the heat.

According to Ecology, there had not been any complaints as of Aug. 5.

“To date, our intersection with this project has been related to solid waste and construction stormwater management,” Zenk said in an email.