Dear Members of the FVRL Board, following the most recent board meeting and the discussions concerning the use of the term equity and the principle of intellectual freedom, I would like to share some concerns regarding the direction of these conversations.
I was particularly struck by the reluctance of some board members to support the use of the word equity, especially given that several of these individuals have publicly shared that they immigrated to the United States, some as refugees seeking safety, opportunity, and greater personal freedom. It is concerning to see a hesitation to embrace concepts that promote fair access and inclusion within our public institutions, including our libraries.
Additionally, certain comments made during the meeting appear to echo messaging from national activist groups such as Moms for Liberty, which has become widely associated with efforts to restrict library collections, challenge educational materials referencing race, ethnicity, or LGBTQ+ communities, and support policy initiatives that many view as limiting access to information. These parallels raise important questions about whether external political agendas are influencing decisions that should remain grounded in the core mission of a public library system.
I am especially troubled by the suggestion to remove or diminish the concept of intellectual freedom in board statements and policies. Intellectual freedom is a foundational value in librarianship, ensuring that individuals have the right to access information and ideas from all viewpoints without undue restriction or surveillance. Protecting this freedom is essential to maintaining a library system that serves the entire community, regardless of background or belief.
Given these concerns, I question whether some current board members possess the commitment to the fundamental values required to effectively steward a public library system. When individuals who have personally experienced environments with limited freedoms adopt positions that could curtail freedom of information for others, it raises significant doubts about their suitability for this role.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the board explore the possibility of a vote of no confidence regarding the members whose actions and statements appear misaligned with the mission and values of FVRL. Our community deserves leaders who will uphold the library’s responsibility to provide equitable access, safeguard intellectual freedom, and resist pressures that would narrow the scope of ideas and information available to the public.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I trust that you will reflect seriously on these matters in the interest of the community you serve.
Paul Clark
Battle Ground
•••
Letters To The Editor
Readers are encouraged to express their views by writing to the editor of The Reflector. Letters are limited 500 words. Deadline is noon Thursday. Writers are limited to two letters per calendar quarter. All letters must be signed with name, address, plus phone number for verification. Items submitted are subject to editing and will become the property of this newspaper. Opinions expressed in the Letters to the Editor section of this newspaper do not necessarily reflect those of The Reflector or its staff.
Email: letters@thereflector.com
Mail: The Reflector, Attention: Letters to the Editor,
209 E Main St., Suite 121, Battle Ground, WA 98604
