In response to Jill Stansbury's recent letter to the editor:
The author begins by warning readers about the slippery slope fallacy, yet much of her letter relies on exactly that kind of reasoning — connecting separate events and then assuming they prove Battle Ground is headed toward Christian nationalism or even white supremacy.
For example, she cites the city’s support of prayer as evidence of a Christian nationalist agenda. Yet, opening legislative meetings with prayer has been a longstanding American tradition.
The U.S. House and Senate regularly begin sessions with prayer, and the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld legislative prayer as constitutional when participation is voluntary and the government does not coerce or discriminate.
A city council allowing an opening prayer is not, by itself, evidence of a plan to establish a theocracy.
She also references the firing of a Battle Ground teacher “due to an assumption that she lacked the right beliefs.” The actual story is considerably more complicated. The teacher was initially fired after a student claimed she celebrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination by
calling him a Nazi. An independent arbitrator later found that allegation was not credible and recommended that she be reinstated with back pay. The district has maintained there were additional reasons for termination unrelated to that allegation, and the dispute remains unresolved.
Whatever one’s opinion of the case, it is inaccurate to present it simply as someone being fired for holding the “wrong beliefs.”
The discussion of downtown property ownership also deserves greater precision. It is true that a private investor and related companies have purchased more than 30 Battle Ground properties. It is also true that one of those projects is a chapel for First Presbyterian Church,
whose pastor, C. R. Wiley, has publicly advocated ideas about Christians “governing unbelievers” and has documented associations with individuals who openly identify as Christian nationalists.
However, those facts do not establish that the investor himself is a Christian nationalist or that Battle Ground’s city government shares such a vision. Oregon Public Broadcasting specifically reported that the investor has not publicly identified himself as a Christian nationalist, even while documenting their associations. The investor has publicly stated that his goal is to revitalize his hometown, create jobs and strengthen the community “whether or not you share our faith.”
Association is not the same as agreement. Building a church for a pastor with controversial views does not automatically mean the builder shares every one of those views, nor does it demonstrate that city officials are implementing them.
The letter also jumps from local policy disagreements to accusations that Battle Ground leaders support white supremacy, encourage violence, endorse torture, intend to persecute minorities or are preparing to punish political opponents.
Those are extraordinarily serious allegations. If they are true, they deserve equally extraordinary evidence. None is presented.
Finally, the author expresses fear that political opponents will be labeled terrorists. If there is an actual Battle Ground ordinance or resolution declaring peaceful critics or anti-fascists to be domestic terrorists, the public should examine it carefully. But absent such evidence, that claim should not be presented as fact.
Battle Ground’s citizens can disagree passionately over religion, immigration, Pride proclamations or the direction of the community. But those debates should be grounded in evidence. Ironically, the letter warns against slippery-slope reasoning while repeatedly assuming that because certain people know one another, worship together, invest together, or hold conservative religious beliefs, Battle Ground is inevitably headed toward a white nationalist theocracy.
That is precisely the kind of speculative leap the author herself cautions others not to make. So, apparently, it's OK if it's one side to write op-eds or letters to the editor that jump to unfounded conclusions, but if the other side did the same, I can just hear the outcry and accusations of hypocrisy.
Renee Ruud
Yacolt
•••
Letters To The Editor
Email: letters@thereflector.com
Mail: The Reflector, Attention: Letters to the Editor,
209 E Main St., Suite 121, Battle Ground, WA 98604
